- Issue
- Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2026 19 (4)
- Authors
- Dolinskaya, Vladimira V.
- Contact information
- Dolinskaya, Vladimira V. : Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL) (Moscow, Russian Federation); ; ORCID: 0000-0002-6002-3111
- Keywords
- protection; property; interest; statute of limitations; corruption; prosecutor; public law; property; private law
- Abstract
The relevance of the study is due to the inclusion in the national interests of the eradication of corruption, the growth of corruption crimes, the recovery of property from corrupt officials both as part of criminal punishment and through civil lawsuits. The main research methods used are analytical, systematic and comparative. The lawsuits of prosecutors on the seizure of property into state ownership under sub-clause 8, clause 2, Article 235 of the Civil Code from the standpoint of constitutional, civil and anti-corruption legislation were considered. The advantages of private law methods in comparison with the means of criminal law and the process in the anti-corruption system are revealed. The property that is the subject of such lawsuits has been specified. Conclusions are drawn about the nature of exceptions to the general legal regime of claims for termination of property rights. The directions of interaction between public and private law in the unified goal-setting of anti-corruption are defined
- Pages
- 784–796
- EDN
- KVFNVG
- Paper at repository of SibFU
- https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/158265
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).