- Issue
- Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2009 2 (3)
- Authors
- Tajmulin, Aleksandr M.
- Contact information
- Aleksandr M. Tajmulin Siberian Federal University, 79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia taimula@rambler.ru
- Keywords
- globalization; regionalization; world order; local; westernization; internationalization
- Abstract
There are two opposite tendencies in political researches: on one hand, there is striving for preservation of political order integrity, on the other hand, one common political order represents a variety of local discursive practices, as far as any attempt of political world’s integral presentation starts to be considered as a comeback to the totalitarian ideology, where scientific discussions perform a function of legitimating narratives. We proceed from the fact, that globalization is a process, which we can actually witness ourselves, and that is why the form of its apprehension must be the most adequate and effective. To our mind, globalization and regionalization are the leading tendencies of the modern world order, which reveal themselves in corresponding forms. Modern researchers’ works, being different by the character of investigation and the style of rendering, are very often united by the common idea: globalization is considered as complexly evolving open system, raising before the world a lot of problems, which solution, and consequently, the prospective of modern civilization development depend upon revealing and deep analysis of these problems.
- Pages
- 379-383
- Paper at repository of SibFU
- https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/1007
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).