Siberian Federal University

Issue

Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2019 12 (7)

Authors

Rocheva, Anna L.; Varshaver, Evgeni A.; Ivanova, Nataliya S.

Contact information

Rocheva, Anna L.: Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Center for Regional and Urban Studies 84/3 Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119571, Russia; ; ORCID: 0000–0002–3181–9698; Varshaver, Evgeni A.: Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Center for Regional and Urban Studies 84/3 Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119571, Russia; ORCID: 0000–0002–5901–8470; Ivanova, Nataliya S.: Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Center for Regional and Urban Studies 84/3 Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119571, Russia; ORCID: 0000–0002–1140–2334

Keywords

migration plans; migration intentions; youth with a migrant background; migrant youth; second generation migrants; 1.5 generation migrants

Abstract

In the context of current demographic situation in Russia, migration is considered one of the most efficient ways of population maintenance if not upsurge. Labour migrants coming to Russia are mostly young people. Moreover, in recent years, the youth who grew up in migrant families — the so called second generation migrants, the 1.5 generation migrants, and migrants of other more fractional categories — are becoming increasingly important. According to the international research, migration plans of these groups of young people can, to a varying extent, include the intentions to return to their or their parents’ country of origin, higher instability being their distinctive feature. In light of this, the issue of the-youth-with-migrant-background’s willingness to plan their future in Russia and, thus, their potential to be the resource for correcting the demographic situation is getting urgent. Basing on qualitative interviews and online surveys, this article considers the issue of how various groups of youth with a migrant background view plans of their future life in Russia and what these plans are connected with. Less than a half of the first generation migrants are willing to stay in Russia, whereas the majority of the second and 1.5 generation migrants plan to live in Russia in future. The factors associated with orientation towards Russia are the respondents’ age at their first migration to Russia and at the moment of the survey, social ties and identification attitudes. They are significant for both groups. However, there are differences as well: for migrants of the second and 1.5 generations the age at their migration to Russia is less important than their feeling of belonging to Russia, whereas these are legal statuses and documents that are decisive for the first generation migrants. Nonetheless, migration plans among youth with migrant a background are malleable, which opens up the receiving state’s opportunities to attract and retain this group

Pages

1256–1281

DOI

10.17516/1997–1370–0453

Paper at repository of SibFU

https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/111799

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).