Siberian Federal University

Issue

Journal of Siberian Federal University. Engineering & Technologies. 2014 7 (5)

Authors

Puzanov, Ilya I.; Zavadyak, Andrey V.; Tretiyakov, Yaroslav A.; Morozov, Mikhail M.; Gubin, Anatoliy A.; Platonov, Vitaliy V.; Darkin, Aleksandr V.

Contact information

Puzanov, Ilya I.:RUSAL ETC Ltd, RUSAL, 37/1 Pogranichnikov Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660111, Russia; Zavadyak, Andrey V.:RUSAL ETC Ltd, RUSAL, 37/1 Pogranichnikov Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660111, Russia; Tretiyakov, Yaroslav A.:RUSAL ETC Ltd, RUSAL, 37/1 Pogranichnikov Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660111, Russia; Morozov, Mikhail M.:RUSAL ETC Ltd, RUSAL, 37/1 Pogranichnikov Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660111, Russia; Gubin, Anatoliy A.:RUSAL ETC Ltd, RUSAL, 37/1 Pogranichnikov Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660111, Russia; Platonov, Vitaliy V.:RUSAL ETC Ltd, RUSAL, 37/1 Pogranichnikov Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660111, Russia; Darkin, Aleksandr V.:RUSAL ETC Ltd, RUSAL, 37/1 Pogranichnikov Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660111, Russia

Keywords

RA-400 high-amperage cell; electrical preheating; technology development and technology management; experiment performance

Abstract

At present, there is no single opinion on which cell preheating method is best. In most cases, such a method (that is to be chosen for a smelter) is chosen based on a number of objective and subjective factors. It is often when a method is chosen that power expenses (either electricity or power generated from fuel combustion) for such a method are not taken into account. However, it can play a crucial role for different regions and influence the production cost of Al. This paper discusses the results of testing the method of electrical preheating in a pilot cell area (RA-400 cells) at OJSC RUSAL Sayanogorsk

Pages

552-560

Paper at repository of SibFU

https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/13330

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).