- Issue
- Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2023 16 (3)
- Authors
- Novikova, Tatyana S.; Gulakova, Olga I.; Ershov, Yurii S.; Ibragimov, Naimdzon M.
- Contact information
- Novikova, Tatyana S.: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; Novosibirsk National Research State University Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; Novosibirsk State Technical University Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; Gulakova, Olga I.: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; Novosibirsk National Research State University Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; Ershov, Yurii S.: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; Ibragimov, Naimdzon M.: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; Novosibirsk National Research State University Novosibirsk, Russian Federation;
- Keywords
- financial and economic efficiency; budgetary efficiency; public effects; social and research infrastructure; public-private partnership
- Abstract
The infrastructure component of the scientific, technological and social development of Russia requires substantial elaboration of the methodology for appraisal of relevant investment projects in the direction of combining financial and economic analysis and evaluating various public effects, including social, indirect, price, tax, environmental and synergistic effects. The aim of the study was to develop an integrated approach to identifying and quantifying the gaps between financial and economic efficiency of different infrastructure projects and justifying the use of adequate mechanisms for their successful implementation. The paper propose methods for estimating the public effects of infrastructure projects using three interrelated models: financial-economic, input-output multi-regional and econometric. By combining these models, it is possible to analyze the development trends of the global, national and regional economy in conjunction with the presentation of investment processes at the microeconomic project level. The proposed methods and models was tested in assessing the efficiency of five real infrastructure projects of various types and scales: the project of seven municipal clinics, the construction of the ESPO‑2 pipeline, two core facility projects of catalysts and enzymes production, the complex of research infrastructure projects project in the Akademgorodok‑2 program
- Pages
- 442–453
- EDN
- KWEMPK
- Paper at repository of SibFU
- https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/149953
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).