Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences: Comparative Analysis of Access and Benefit Sharing Regimes in India and Russia in Context of Indigenous People and Local Communities

Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences / Comparative Analysis of Access and Benefit Sharing Regimes in India and Russia in Context of Indigenous People and Local Communities

Full text (.pdf)

Issue: Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2016 9 (1)
Authors: Arjjumend, Hasrat; Alam, Sabiha; Koivurova, Timo; Shishatskiy, Nikolay G.
Contact information: Arjjumend, Hasrat:The MMAJ Academy of International Studies Jamia NagarDELHI , New Delhi-110025 INDIA Environment & Sustainable Development; E-mail: ; Alam, Sabiha:The MMAJ Academy of International Studies Jamia NagarDELHI , New Delhi-110025 INDIA Environment & Sustainable Development; Koivurova, Timo:University of Lapland P.O. Box 122, Arktikum House, Pohjoisranta 4, Rovaniemi FIN-96101, FINLAND; Shishatskiy, Nikolay G.:Siberian Federal University 79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russia
Keywords: access and benefit sharing; indigenous people & local communities; Nagoya Protocol; genetic resources; biopiracy; convention on biological diversity; biodiversity governance
Abstract: Conforming to the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising out of their Utilisation (ABS), India has developed legislation and established statutory mechanisms, while Russia is evolving such legislation. The recognition and space of indigenous people and local communities (ILCs)1 in domestic ABS regimes of Russia and India, and their participation/involvement in processes of international negotiations and domestic law making have been found scarce and inadequate
Pages: 265-290
Paper at repository of SibFU: https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/20029

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).